<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NDP-Liberal Coalition: Very Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/12/03/ndp-liberal-coalition-very-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/12/03/ndp-liberal-coalition-very-legal/</link>
	<description>where democracy speaks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bianca</title>
		<link>http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/12/03/ndp-liberal-coalition-very-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Bianca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whining.weaselhut.net/?p=182#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>Judging by your comment, you obviously haven&#039;t seen any earlier posts, otherwise you&#039;d have known that I had mentioned a membership in that party.

During the election, politicians say plenty, and yes, he did say he&#039;d never make a coalition.  But, when there is an election, politicians, unless they&#039;re Duceppe go in wanting to take the PMO with a majority.  So, typically there will not be talk of a coalition.

The coalition was a result of Harper&#039;s incessant bullying.  Taking away the federal servant&#039;s right to strike was quite harsh.  Taking away subsidies for political parties was another trigger.  After all, it&#039;s big money and the corporations who thrive on the corporate welfare that the Tories love to dish out that keeps them alive.  The loss would be easier for them to stomach.  Typically immigrant communities flock to the Liberal and NDP, and these people have little money.

Propaganda takes money.  What better way to silence the opposition than to take away the money that would help them?  And doing it while taking it away for yourself disguises your true intentions to the brainwashed sheep that were stupid enough to vote for the Tories in the first place.

Then there&#039;s the mishandling of the economy.  I assume you&#039;re familiar with the term &quot;laissez-faire&quot;?  A practice that in conjunction with deregulation can lead to the downturn of the economy.

All right then, it&#039;s your turn.

Harper&#039;s unleashed a series of negative ads on the radio and television.  Why would you support something like that when if you look at the facts it becomes apparent that he&#039;s a cornered rat resorting to childish tactics to hold onto power instead of accepting that he&#039;s lost the confidence of the house?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by your comment, you obviously haven&#8217;t seen any earlier posts, otherwise you&#8217;d have known that I had mentioned a membership in that party.</p>
<p>During the election, politicians say plenty, and yes, he did say he&#8217;d never make a coalition.  But, when there is an election, politicians, unless they&#8217;re Duceppe go in wanting to take the PMO with a majority.  So, typically there will not be talk of a coalition.</p>
<p>The coalition was a result of Harper&#8217;s incessant bullying.  Taking away the federal servant&#8217;s right to strike was quite harsh.  Taking away subsidies for political parties was another trigger.  After all, it&#8217;s big money and the corporations who thrive on the corporate welfare that the Tories love to dish out that keeps them alive.  The loss would be easier for them to stomach.  Typically immigrant communities flock to the Liberal and NDP, and these people have little money.</p>
<p>Propaganda takes money.  What better way to silence the opposition than to take away the money that would help them?  And doing it while taking it away for yourself disguises your true intentions to the brainwashed sheep that were stupid enough to vote for the Tories in the first place.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the mishandling of the economy.  I assume you&#8217;re familiar with the term &#8220;laissez-faire&#8221;?  A practice that in conjunction with deregulation can lead to the downturn of the economy.</p>
<p>All right then, it&#8217;s your turn.</p>
<p>Harper&#8217;s unleashed a series of negative ads on the radio and television.  Why would you support something like that when if you look at the facts it becomes apparent that he&#8217;s a cornered rat resorting to childish tactics to hold onto power instead of accepting that he&#8217;s lost the confidence of the house?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/12/03/ndp-liberal-coalition-very-legal/comment-page-1/#comment-5584</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whining.weaselhut.net/?p=182#comment-5584</guid>
		<description>Are you a member of NDP??
Dion also said he would not form a coalition.
So you tell me who&#039;s full of shit!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a member of NDP??<br />
Dion also said he would not form a coalition.<br />
So you tell me who&#8217;s full of shit!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

