<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You Ontario for Yet Another Unenforceable Law!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/03/05/thank-you-ontario-for-yet-another-unenforceable-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/03/05/thank-you-ontario-for-yet-another-unenforceable-law/</link>
	<description>where democracy speaks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul A.</title>
		<link>http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/03/05/thank-you-ontario-for-yet-another-unenforceable-law/comment-page-1/#comment-4351</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whining.weaselhut.net/2008/03/05/thank-you-ontario-for-yet-another-unenforceable-law/#comment-4351</guid>
		<description>You might have a point in that the law will not cover all of the cases of people smoking in a car with a person under the age of 16. However, you neglect a various obvious scenario that this law was most likely intended to address: a situation where a police officer spots someone smoking while driving in the presence of a child clearly under the age of 16 in the car. In that case, the law is clearly enforceable. Furthermore, it&#039;s just: second-hand smoke is extremely deadly, and there should be legal recourse of any parent who exposes their children to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have a point in that the law will not cover all of the cases of people smoking in a car with a person under the age of 16. However, you neglect a various obvious scenario that this law was most likely intended to address: a situation where a police officer spots someone smoking while driving in the presence of a child clearly under the age of 16 in the car. In that case, the law is clearly enforceable. Furthermore, it&#8217;s just: second-hand smoke is extremely deadly, and there should be legal recourse of any parent who exposes their children to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

